helloladies: Horseshoe icon with the words Lady Business underneath. (Default)
Hello, Ladies ([personal profile] helloladies) wrote in [community profile] ladybusiness2013-01-27 01:42 am

Sidetracks - January 27, 2013

Sidetracks is a collaborative project featuring various essays, videos, reviews, or other Internet content that we want to share with each other. All past and current links for the Sidetracks project can be found in our Sidetracks tag.





text that says Renay's Section

➝ Listen to this amazing Turret Anthem! Even if you're not a Portal fan, it's great. (via The Mary Sue)

➝ There have been some more great posts about the Hugo Awards recently. Kristen wrote one, and Calico Reaction's What Should I Read Before the Hugos? turned up some additional things not on my radar. Aidan shared a list of some of the interesting posts he's featured, which was really useful. Then came the other day when Seanan McGuire posted about some of her choices (some of which I hadn't heard of, yay for suggestions!) and quoted something I wrote and called it amazing? Yeah, I'll be over there. >.>

Man breathing into a paperbag.


But this made me think; how many bloggers actually participate in the award? Because all in all I don't see a lot of bloggers talk about their nominations before or after they've closed, nor do I see a lot of interaction on blogs about the finalists or winners. Is it happening on mailing lists or message boards (and therefore places I don't know exist or don't go to) or something? Is this secretly a closed project where talking about what you plan to nominate is in bad taste? #mysteries


This awesome drawing may be a movie one day. I would not be adverse to seeing it, either. Look at that teddy bear face down the monster!

➝ One of my favorite books by Neil Gaiman (err, maybe the only favorite book, actually) is The Graveyard Book I am super excited to see it might be on its way to becoming a live-action movie. Although I was pretty sad when the stop-motion version fell through, this is a story that can be done either way now that we've come so far with technology. Yes, please, Hollywood. ;__; (via io9)

➝ I implore you to watch this music video and then read this preview of the most amazing lyric deconstruction you have seen so far in 2013. I bet you five adorable kittens you will click through to read the whole thing.

Stevie Nicks is a queen, a witch, a dragon; she's in control. Stevie Nicks is there for us. This essay is full of so many great quotes.

When you grow up as a girl, the world tells you the things that you are supposed to be: emotional, loving, beautiful, wanted. And then when you are those things, the world tells you they are inferior: illogical, weak, vain, empty. [...] The world says that you don't have a right to the space you occupy, any place with men in it is not yours, you and your body exist only as far as what men want to do with it.


Gerard Way wants you to love yourself, okay? (DO IT.)

➝ Have your weekly dose of Jennifer Lawrence being awesome.




text that says Ana's Section

➝ I don't know much at all about asexuality and the last thing I want to do is to appropriate, but this post about defining significant others still really resonated with me, especially this bit:

It's not so much the idea of having a significant other that irks me than the quite narrow expectations that seem to come attached to it.

The first is that there should be a significant other at any point in your life, and that that person will be the person you are in a romantic and sexual relationship with, as per the standard formula. They will be the person that comes first in your life, the person whom you are closest to, the person on whom you can depend more than anyone else.

The second is the assumption that there will only be one person who fulfills this role; one person who will be thesignificant other,. At least, one person at any given time. I find that this assumption still gets played out quite bit in the romantic ace community.

Neither of those expectations sit well with me, for reasons of compulsory sexuality as well as exclusion of the idea that you can love people differently and that you can love more than one person. Unfortunately, the idea of a significant other gets caught up with all those other ideas about love and romance and ends up just re-iterating the same narrow definition and pedestalling of love – that is, romantic-sexual love for one person that forms the be-all and end-all of your existence.


I agree with this completely even though I do have a significant other in the traditional sense of the term. But it seems to me that not expecting one single person to fulfill all your emotional needs all the time makes for healthier relationships.

Reading this post put me in mind of a really helpful conversation I had with a friend recently: it was about the concept of the BFF and how it's sold (to women in particular) in a way that's reminiscent of the concept of the "soulmate". You're expected to have another woman in your life who is (and ideally has always been) your one best friend; and if you can't or won't rank your friend, or if you have several people you've felt closest to at different points in your life and who all matter to you, you're made to feel inadequate and like you're lacking something. Well, screw that. I'm done with letting this narrative have any hold on me. I have different friends that I share completely different aspects of myself and of my life with, and that's absolutely fine.

➝ Sort of related and very timely for me: John Green on why the "just" before "just friends" grates (dear world, non-romantic relationships matter too). And here's Hank's response video, How to Make Friends, which is even better and which made me tear up.

Joss Whedon's Much Ado About Nothing has a release date! Excited :D

➝ And look, there's a list of comics by ladies at Flavorwire (most of which were immediately added to my wishlist).

➝ Lastly, Smuggler!Ana introduced me to a blog by a third Ana this week and I'm completely in love. Here's Ana Mardoll on why deconstruction (or criticism) matters and on liking problematic things:

Being able to like or dislike the things we experience is a freedom of choice that no one should give up or try to take away. Being able to discuss the aspects that we like and the aspects that we didn't is a valuable way to compare experiences and express unique viewpoints. Being able to find something worthwhile in an otherwise-problematic piece reminds us that even bad art can have a purpose; being able to find problems in an otherwise-perfect piece reminds us that even good art is created by flawed humans. Being unable to agree which things are worthwhile and which things are problematic and which things the author intended or not sharpens our communication abilities and our critical thinking skills.

Artistic analysis isn't about finding The Answer. It's not about making a list of Good Art and Bad Art and then having everyone realign their tastes to match. It's not about coming to an agreement. It's about experiencing different viewpoints and understanding why other people think differently from you. And it's about taking those new perspectives with you and applying them to the next piece of art you experience.







text that says Jodie's Section

➝ It's been a long week. Shall we watch some tigers play in the snow first?



American women can now serve on the front line. I think this is especially interesting because it challenges the idea that women are physically inferior and goes against all those 'but what about the menz emotional reaction to seeing female soldiers get shot' articles. A score for equality.

➝ The Mary Sue has a list of eight ideas for historical TV series based around women's lives. WANT.

Harvey the kitten has to walk on his elbows because he has no leg bones in his front legs. He is adorable (although in need of an operation soon to stop him from injuring his spine). Why would anyone ever try to give him away?

Look at this gorgeous rainbow dress made from children's books. Hundreds of writers are now trying to work this into their next novel.

Peanut butter stuffed Oreos with sprinkles. Treats to save for the very worst days I think.

➝ And speaking of pick me ups for the bad days, try getting through 'Neon Pegasus' without feeling a little bit more hopeful. I love how Parry Gripp has managed to create this intriguing backstory through a few simple lyrics.
myfriendamy: (Default)

[personal profile] myfriendamy 2013-01-27 09:00 am (UTC)(link)
aw I love that quote from the third Ana!!

And nice link to the Mary Sue piece, I saw a list of books that would make great TV shows on EW this week and they were all written by men. I meant to do a response post of my own with books by women that would make good TV shows, but alas I never got to it. So it's nice to see! The CW did order a pilot based on Mary Queen of Scots, though I think it might add some fantasy stuff in.

Re: BFFs, I don't have one. I've had different "best friends" at different times in my life, but admittedly I do tend to only be really close to one or two people at a time. I think the concept of a BFF might be idealized and I think a lot of people end up just really longing for that without having it.
nymeth: (Default)

[personal profile] nymeth 2013-01-27 09:31 am (UTC)(link)
You could still do that post. I would love to see it :D #nopressure

And yeah, I think you're right about the concept of the BFF being idealised. The conversation I had was eye-opening for me because while I've been questioning the concept of the "one true love" for years, I'd never really paused to consider the parallels before. I mean, it's fine if you have someone like that in your life (just like it's fine if someone, say, marries their highschool boyfriend/girlfriend and stays with them for the rest of their lives), but those of us whose friendships (or romantic lives) follow different patterns aren't necessarily broken or incomplete.

About only ever being really close to a couple of people at a time, though, I think that's how it goes for everyone.
bookgazing: (Default)

[personal profile] bookgazing 2013-01-27 11:49 am (UTC)(link)
Amy you should make that post! We could make like a massive joint post if you like. I would be totally down for that :)

I think one of the nice things about friendship is that your relationships can be really flexible, so if say a close friend moves away you can become closer to another friend without that meaning that you're forever distanced from the first friend. It's not one of the other, it's all :)
nymeth: (Default)

[personal profile] nymeth 2013-01-27 11:56 am (UTC)(link)
Agreed - I wanted my whole point to be that anyone who claims otherwise can eff off :P

PS: You and Amy should totally do that massive joint post :D #againnopressure
myfriendamy: (Default)

[personal profile] myfriendamy 2013-01-27 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)
but those of us whose friendships (or romantic lives) follow different patterns aren't necessarily broken or incomplete.

aw yeah you're right. I think there's also something about wanting to be the one, the one that's liked best more than any other, etc. that's a part of this fantasy. And I do think it can happen and does exist but also think it is less common to have a BFF than to not have one!

And also like you said I think it does lead to healthy relationships when you have different people you share your life with because the burden isn't on any one person to be all things to you.

[identity profile] theliteraryomnivore.wordpress.com 2013-01-27 04:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Ana, I hereby sign off on your asexuality permission slip! I lean more towards identifying as queer these days, but I've ID'd as some kind of ace since high school and examining the world through that lens has been a huge help for me. The narrative of The One and, as you point out, The Best Friend can be quite restricting, and always terrified me as a kid—I never had "a best friend", though I had (and have!) wonderful friends, and I thought something was wrong me because I didn't. Removing that narrative from my life was a huge boon to me, and it looks like it's been a huge boon to you. SMASHING HURTFUL NARRATIVES IS FUN AND USEFUL!

As a side note that's partially related, do you read Captain Awkward (http://captainawkward.com/) at all? I've been recommending her like a madwoman recently, but she rejects both of those narratives as well in her advice.
nymeth: (Default)

[personal profile] nymeth 2013-01-27 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the next time something of this sort gets to me I'll imagine a voice in my head saying (in all caps): "SMASHING HURTFUL NARRATIVES IS FUN AND USEFUL!" :D

I've visited Captain Awkward occasionally but I've never subscribed for whatever reason. Thanks for the rec; will definitely fix that now!

[identity profile] theliteraryomnivore.wordpress.com 2013-02-03 12:20 pm (UTC)(link)
It, of course, would be in the voice of FEMINIST HULK.